Russia Seeks Staggering Amount in Compensation from Euroclear Regarding Seized Funds
The Russian central bank has announced it is pursuing damages amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This action represents a clear warning from the Kremlin against proposals to use immobilized Russian state assets to support Ukraine.
The Legal Claim
Based on reports in local news outlets, the central bank filed a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.
EU leaders will decide later this week regarding a proposal to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme involves granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and financial needs.
Most of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary keeper for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.
Dispute on Ownership
EU officials have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. Their position is based on the principle that title of the state assets remains with Russia, even though it was frozen in European jurisdictions following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.
Moscow, in contrast, has called any utilization of the funds as theft. It has threatened retaliatory actions, including confiscating EU corporate holdings within Russia.
The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a prominent role in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.
Wider Implications
With statements seen as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official described the assets plan as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system created by the United States."
The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the new legal action. The institution has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.
Legal Hurdles Ahead
Although judges in European nations are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.
"The Bank of Russia may attempt to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that such holdings can be identified," commented a lawyer from an international firm.
EU Countermeasures
EU officials said they are working on measures to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. They are also designing protections to protect EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."
How the Funding Would Work
According to the complex scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.
Kyiv would only be obligated to return the money if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense damage inflicted during the ongoing war.
Alternative Proposals
Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.
This alternative move, however, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.
Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful signal that if you cause all this damage to another nation, you have to pay for the reparations."