🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in an organized professional network test recently after viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."