🔗 Share this article

Picture this: a happy Rasmus Højlund wearing Napoli's colors. Next, juxtapose it with a dejected the Slovenian forward sporting United's jersey, appearing like he's missed a sitter. Don't bother finding an actual photo of him missing; context is your adversary. Then, add statistics in a big, silly font. Don't forget some emoticons. Share the image everywhere.

Would you mention that Højlund's goal count includes scores in the Champions League while his counterpart isn't playing in Europe? Of course not. And would you note that several of the Dane's goals were scored versus Belarus and Greece, or that his national team is far superior to Slovenia and generates far more chances. If you manage social media for a major brand, pure interaction is your livelihood, Manchester United are the biggest draw, and context is your sworn enemy.

So the cycle of online material turns. The next job is to scan a lengthy interview featuring the legendary goalkeeper and extract the part where he describes the acquisition of Sesko "weird". There's a bit, where he qualifies his remarks by saying, "I have nothing bad to say about Benjamin Sesko"... well, remove that part. No one wants that. Just ensure "weird" and "the player" are paired in the title. The audience will be furious.

This Time of Promise and Hasty Opinions

The heart of fall has long been one of my preferred times to observe football. The leaves swirl, the wind turns, squads and strategies are newly formed, all is novel and yet patterns are emerging. The stars of the season ahead are planting their flags. The summer market is shut. Nobody is mentioning the multiple trophies yet. Everyone are in contention. At this precise point, all is possibility.

However, for similar reasons, mid-autumn has long been one of my most disliked times to read about football. Because although no outcomes are decided, something must always be getting settled. Jack Grealish is resurgent. Florian Wirtz has been a major letdown. Could Semenyo be the top performer in the league at this moment? We need a decision immediately.

The Player as The Prime Example

And for numerous reasons, Sesko feels like the archetype in this context, a player caught between football's two countervailing, unavoidable forces. The imperative to delay final conclusions, allowing technical development and strategic understanding to mature. And the imperative to produce permanent verdicts, a conveyor belt of takes and memes, out-of-context criticisms and meaningless comparisons, a square that can not truly be circled.

I do not propose to provide a substantive evaluation of Sesko's time at Manchester United so far. He has been in the lineup four times in the top flight in a highly unpredictable team, found the net twice, and had a mere of 116 contacts with the ball. What precisely are we evaluating? Nor do I propose to duplicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's seminal masterwork "The Sesko Debate", in which two of England's leading pundits argue thrillingly on a podcast over whether Sesko needs 10 goals to be deemed successful this season (Neville), or whether it is more like 12 or 13 (Wright).

A Cruel Environment

Despite this I loved watching him at his former club: a powerful, fast racing car of a forward, playing in a team ideally suited to his talents: afforded the license to rampage but also the leeway to miss. And in part this is why Manchester United feels like the cruellest place he could possibly be right now: a place where "brutal verdicts" are handed down in roughly the duration it takes to watch a short advertisement, the club with the largest and most pitiless gulf between the patience and space he requires, and the opportunity he is going to get.

We saw a case of this over the national team pause, when a viral chart conveniently stated that the player had been deemed – by a wide margin – the worst signing of the recent market by a poll of 20 agents. Naturally, the press are by no means alone in such behavior. Club channels, online personalities, anonymous X accounts with a suspiciously high number of pornbot followers: everybody with a vested interest is now essentially aligned along the same principles, an environment explicitly nosed towards provocation.

The Psychological Toll

Scroll, scroll, tap, scroll. What are we doing to ourselves? Do we realize, on any level, what this endless sluice of irritation is doing to our brains? Separate from the inherent strangeness of being a player in the center of it all, aware on a bizarre butterfly-effect level that each aspect about them is now basically content, product, open-source property to be repackaged and exchanged.

Indeed, in part this is because it's Manchester United, the corpse that continues to feed the cycle, a major institution that must always be producing the strong emotions. But also, partly this is a seasonal affliction, a swing of opinion most visibly and cruelly glimpsed at this season, about a month after the window has closed. Throughout the summer we have been desiring footballers, eulogising them, salivating over them. Yet, only a handful of games later, many of those very players are already being dismissed as broken goods. Is it time to worry about a new signing? Was Arsenal's purchase of Viktor Gyökeres necessary? What was the purpose of Randal Kolo Muani?

A Wider Issue

It feels appropriate that he meets Liverpool on the weekend: a team simultaneously on a long unbeaten run at home in the league and somehow in their own state of perceived turmoil, like filing a missing person’s report on someone who went to the shops half an hour ago. Defensively suspect. Mohamed Salah finished. The striker an expensive flop. Arne Slot bald.

Maybe we have failed to understand the way the storyline of football has started to replace football the actual game, to influence the way we view it, an whole competition reoriented around discussion topics and reaction, something that occurs in the background while we browse through our devices, incapable to detach from the saline drip of opinions and further hot takes. It may be Sesko taking the hit at present. However, everyone is losing something here.